\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

ANTINATALIST BROS: new Sam Harris podcast with David Benatar!!

Been waiting for this for a year...early Christmas present! ...
antinatalism
  12/06/17
wow, finally something that i agree with sam harris about ...
THOT_RAVAGER
  12/06/17
Sam Harris is a natalistcuck
antinatalism
  12/06/17
...
THOT_RAVAGER
  12/07/17
damn it - i read this as "sam hyde" talking about ...
,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,.
  12/06/17
just realized they were two different people
Wilbur Mercer, low income poaster
  12/06/17
Holy shit 180 But Sam Harris is a kidhaver which adds an ...
Oh, you travel?
  12/06/17
yeah sam tries his usual kike mind tricks but can't outkike ...
antinatalism
  12/06/17
...
antinatalism
  12/07/17
barely into it- non-loss of good and loss of bad seems 120
HodlUpHodlUpWait
  12/07/17
harris is getting too bogged down in anti-natalism vs. pro-m...
,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,.
  12/07/17


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2017 3:59 PM
Author: antinatalism (arhat)

Been waiting for this for a year...early Christmas present!

https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/is-life-actually-worth-living

Sam Harris fanboys discuss: https://www.reddit.com/r/samharris/comments/7hukcj/107_is_life_actually_worth_living/?utm_content=comments&utm_medium=hot&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=samharris

Jordan Peterson fanbois discuss: https://www.reddit.com/r/JordanPeterson/comments/7hyqcl/new_episode_of_sam_harriss_podcast_is_called_is/

Antinatalist bros discuss: https://www.reddit.com/r/antinatalism/comments/7hul7c/david_benatar_talks_with_sam_harris_on_the_waking/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34854761)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2017 4:00 PM
Author: THOT_RAVAGER

wow, finally something that i agree with sam harris about

dude must be desperate for traffic if he stooped as low as this dork

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34854772)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2017 4:01 PM
Author: antinatalism (arhat)

Sam Harris is a natalistcuck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34854790)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2017 4:18 PM
Author: THOT_RAVAGER



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34862812)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2017 4:19 PM
Author: ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,.


damn it - i read this as "sam hyde" talking about antinatalism and was looking forward to another ted-style garbage economy talk.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34854978)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2017 4:22 PM
Author: Wilbur Mercer, low income poaster (Short Pride World Wide)

just realized they were two different people

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34855006)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2017 4:21 PM
Author: Oh, you travel?

Holy shit 180

But Sam Harris is a kidhaver which adds an element of personalism to his arguments. Haven't listened yet but don't expect much

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34854998)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2017 4:33 PM
Author: antinatalism (arhat)

yeah sam tries his usual kike mind tricks but can't outkike benatar

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34855127)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2017 6:42 AM
Author: antinatalism (arhat)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34859330)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2017 7:51 AM
Author: HodlUpHodlUpWait

barely into it- non-loss of good and loss of bad seems 120

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34859506)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2017 4:10 PM
Author: ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,.


harris is getting too bogged down in anti-natalism vs. pro-mortalism. i don't think that distinction particularly matters; that's more like an "edge case" within a wider set of cases than the hinge of the debate in general. who cares about the current living? the question is whether or not that set should be voluntarily expanded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3820018&forum_id=2#34862738)